3 ms·
Founder here. Just wanted to say I hear you and the other comments below echo'ing your feedback and am going to get on it!
by faisalkhalid80 10y ago
Founder here. Just wanted to say I hear you and the other comments below echo'ing your feedback and am going to get on it!
- bschwindHN 10y agoThis is a static page. It doesn't need JavaScript. It doesn't need a loading screen. It doesn't need scroll-jacking. It doesn't need to pollute my browser history. These kinds of decisions make zero sense to me. It's not only easier to implement a static page without all this stuff, it's more pleasant to the people you want looking at the page. You have grammatical mistakes and poor design choices (thin white text which runs over a woman's blonde hair). The page weighs in at 38.1 MB and took my browser 20 seconds to load. Even if the scroll-jacking wasn't a bother, it performs horribly and takes seconds to move between pages. Sorry to be harsh, but I can't believe any reasonable person took a look at this and gave it an okay.
- nommm-nommm 10y agoEverything said here is true. You have maybe 10-15 small sentences of information and that's it. Waiting 42 seconds to read 15 sentences is plainly unacceptable. 42 seconds is no exaggeration, I timed it.
- notheguyouthink 10y agoI'm on a low ram macbook pro (and have docker VMs running atm), the choppiness of that page was insane haha.