3 ms·
I agree that autonomous doesn't have to be perfect, it just has to be better than humans (by how much we will leave to regulators) but it's not clear that the a
by narak 10y ago
I agree that autonomous doesn't have to be perfect, it just has to be better than humans (by how much we will leave to regulators) but it's not clear that the actual safety of these systems has kept up with the marketing around them. I would love to see the evidence.
- pm90 10y ago> it just has to be better than humans I really don't see this being approved with just that notion. Its most certainly a rational argument, but people aren't good at making rational decisions. So the standard would have to be much much better, if this is to be approved.
- astrodust 10y agoThis particular failure of the autopilot system will be addressed in some capacity. The resulting patch will be pushed out to all Tesla cars. Every single driver using autopilot will benefit from this incident. The same is absolutely not true with human drivers.
- AnsemWise 10y agoNHTSA’s full final investigation into Tesla’s Autopilot shows 40% crash rate reduction https://techcrunch.com/2017/01/19/nhtsas-full-final-investigation-into-teslas-autopilot-shows-40-crash-rate-reduction/ https://techcrunch.com/2017/01/19/nhtsas-full-final-investig... Here's the evidence.
- mannykannot 10y agoThe systems that steer the car should be evaluated independently of the emergency braking features, or else the benefits of the latter could mask deficiencies of the former.