i'm deeply offended by an attitude that leads to word-choices such as "useless" and "bums" and "superfluous" in regard to human beings who simply do not have jo

i'm deeply offended by an attitude that leads to word-choices such as "useless" and "bums" and "superfluous" in regard to human beings who simply do not have jobs. are people really "useless" if they do not provide labor to make rich people richer? if the economic system can't make a profit off your presence, are you "superfluous"? is this the mentality that would cause our "leaders" to abandon health-care for the large majority of our population who will soon be unable to afford insurance? and please don't tell me that a _job_ is necessary to make people feel useful. many wealthy people seem to be able to do nothing productive at all, without having doubt about their right to exist.