4 ms·
Because she is unfortunately incorrect. Just because I support her doesn't mean I can't be factually objective. It sounds like some sort of miscommunication. H
by employee8000 10y ago
Because she is unfortunately incorrect. Just because I support her doesn't mean I can't be factually objective. It sounds like some sort of miscommunication.
Here is the official statement from Uber:
"The law firm Perkins Coie is looking into the specific allegations raised by Susan. They will report into Eric Holder, who is responsible for the overall investigation into Uber's workplace practices. To be clear: they are investigating Susan's claims, not Susan personally."
In an email from one of our lawyers, she specifically mentions that Uber has been in constant contact with Susan's lawyers so this was a surprise. And that Uber of course doesn't hold Susan to blame for anything.
- alphonsegaston 10y agoI'm sorry, but I'll wait for futher word from Susan on this. Uber and it's surrogates have little in the way of credibility in this regard, given that they've intentionally lied about similar behavior in the past. http://www.theverge.com/2016/7/15/12201134/uber-ergo-admit-lie-investigation-court-travis-kalanick http://www.theverge.com/2016/7/15/12201134/uber-ergo-admit-l...
- employee8000 10y agoThat's your prerogative. I choose to believe this was a misunderstanding on the part of Susan. Of course, if there is further evidence then I would love to hear it and make a new decision then.