4 ms·

re: "ls -l" understood. I ran "ls -ld ."

• jff 10y ago
  Ah, I'm not familiar with dtrace so I guess I missed that in your comment. Thanks for the clarification.
  • bch 10y ago
    Understandable. The dtrace command you see is tracing a process "ls" (regardless of switches). I didn't show my work (ls -ld .) that generated the output, so your confusion isn't unfounded. :)