This type of off-by-one error is so common it has its own name: fencepost error[1]. One little note, is that I would disagree with your correction. > This sho

This type of off-by-one error is so common it has its own name: fencepost error[1]. One little note, is that I would disagree with your correction. > This should be corrected to: > > The number of values between the two is 0x3f800000 - 0x00000000 == 0x3f800001 I think the value originally computed was correct. It would make more sense to correct the wording rather than just the computed value. i.e. > The number of values in the range [0x00000000, 0x3f800000] is 0x3f800000 - 0x00000000 + 1 == 0x3f800001 [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-by-one_error#Fencepost_error https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-by-one_error#Fencepost_err...