3 ms·
I think this is probably right. It is very common when a company has been sued (or, in this case, probably worries that it will be sued) for the company's lawye
by pdabbadabba 10y ago
I think this is probably right. It is very common when a company has been sued (or, in this case, probably worries that it will be sued) for the company's lawyers to conduct a pretty deep background investigation on the (would-be) plaintiff.
It's not necessarily a savory practice, nor is it universal, but it is definitely common.
I think it's unfortunate that Fowler has to go through this indignity as well as what she dealt with when she was actually working for Uber. But I'd frankly be surprised if Uber's lawyers weren't investigating her, just in case.
- tobtoh 10y agoJust to nitpick ... 'on the (would-be) plaintiff.' ... IIRC, Susan has not made any indication she intends to sue. Her article merely commented on her experience at Uber and I didn't pick up any language which indicated she was still annoyed or angry enough to want to sue.
- OJFord 10y agoIt's cheaper to investigate their potential liability than to risk it though.