4 ms·
Reminds me of Twitter IPO... just wait.
by pibefision 10y ago
Reminds me of Twitter IPO... just wait.
- moolcool 10y agoI think this will be worse. Snapchat isn't nearly as culturally sticky as Twitter. Sites like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook have a robust friend/follower system, and users have a huge backlog of things they contributed to the platforms. No contributions on Snapchat last more than a single day, so what is motivating users to stay on the platform instead of using Facebook or Instagram's offerings? Their friends lists exist both of those places too. In 10 years we'll look back on Snapchat as a flash in the pan.
- briantmaurer 10y agoThis isn't entirely true – Snapchat already has features that let you save content permanently.
- jeffbax 10y agoI think Snap has potential to be huge… anything that wins the race to replace TV is going to be big. Whether they can do it before FB clones them/leverages their network is a big open question. That said, despite the fact that I love Twitter more than any other network, almost none of my friends use it maybe ~a dozen people I know closely in real life still post to it. Almost all of my friends use Snapchat and complain about my lack of engagement with it. Anecdotal, but I don't think they are comparable… additionally if your (likely closer nit group of vs. FB's "everyone you know") friends aren't posting, brands are putting up a TON that people seem to really like.
- moolcool 10y agoSnap is the last thing that would replace TV. Nobody sits down and spends a consecutive hour on Snapchat
- sgnl 10y agoexactly, people only have a few seconds to watch "TV" now so why not watch a snapchat story? This is their "TV"
- slackoverflower 10y agoNeither does anyone an hour watching TV anymore? Everyone within the age range 18-30 in the US definitely spends more time on Snapchat than TV right now.
- chrishn 10y agoSnapchat has Memories... /s