4 ms·
His argument isn't that you need air and naval. Its that air and naval are, generally, more cost effective.
by 013a 10y ago
His argument isn't that you need air and naval. Its that air and naval are, generally, more cost effective.
- 67726e 10y agoNo, he flat out said that a bunch of dudes with guns are not a deterrent in this day and age. If that's not what he said, let him speak for himself.