4 ms·
To a depressing degree, most of our society's efforts against suicide work like this. The issue gets ignored altogether until someone is perceived to be in imme
by Bartweiss 10y ago
To a depressing degree, most of our society's efforts against suicide work like this. The issue gets ignored altogether until someone is perceived to be in immediate danger, and then they either get support or (all too often) a three day psychiatric hold.
This process is terrible on so many levels. The psych hold in particular is both excessive (f someone isn't suicidal, it's a pointless kidnapping) and insufficient. (If someone just attempted suicide, they're at low risk right after. If someone gets antidepressants, three days isn't long enough for them to kick in.)
I suppose Facebook isn't in a position to help earlier on (at least, not without even more privacy invasion), but we definitely don't intervene in this issue at sensible times.
- dredmorbius 10y agoThe kinds of interventions I'm looking for would be deep and social (see my other reply in this thread). The thing about healthcare, physical or mental, is that early and sustained efforts pay of vastly more greatly than heroic acute efforts. I'm increasingly convinced that the traditional Chinese concept of paying the doctor when you are well is an approach well worth considering, and possibly adopting. It's also quite helpful to realise that not all ills can be healed. Almost all can be made far more tolerable, though, at the very least.