3 ms·
I could see this being true. I have concerns of course, but it might make sense. Maybe instead of making $100k, people would rather make $50k and work much less
by tuna-piano 10y ago
I could see this being true. I have concerns of course, but it might make sense. Maybe instead of making $100k, people would rather make $50k and work much less. That would happen naturally, with article like this, discussions, and companies and people experimenting with new things.
What scares me is when it goes from that to "the government should mandate / provide this". I would see no reason that would not lead to a bad outcome similiar to other socialist countries.
And remember, when people say that we decrease our societies working hours by 1/2, 2/3, etc they are saying that we should halve the number of doctors, teachers, pilots, farmers, etc. This guy may think accountants, consultants, etc are fake make-work jobs, but I've never seen a company knowingly being someone on when they know that person won't add value to the company (and therefore the society as well).
- aninhumer 10y ago>when people say that we decrease our societies working hours by 1/2, 2/3, etc they are saying that we should halve the number of doctors, teachers, pilots, farmers, etc. No, they mean there should be twice as many of them working half as much (or less, if there are productivity improvements). Obviously that would be hard to achieve in the short term, because these jobs require training, but that doesn't mean it's impossible.