> What does Haskell have to show for, besides badly documented libraries and compiler implementations? Off the top of my head, the Darcs revision control syste

> What does Haskell have to show for, besides badly documented libraries and compiler implementations? Off the top of my head, the Darcs revision control system, the awesome Pandoc tool (http://pandoc.org/ http://pandoc.org/), and the Xmonad window manager. All of these are fully-featured and battle-tested software that don't require any knowledge of Haskell to use on a day-to-day basis. Facebook also uses Haskell to write parts of its software stack, but most of that code is proprietary and not available for reading. There are many more examples: https://wiki.haskell.org/Haskell_in_practice https://wiki.haskell.org/Haskell_in_practice https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-most-famous-software-written-in-Haskell-and-why-arent-there-more-I-know-of-xmonad-and-that-Standard-Chartered-used-it-in-production-Are-there-others https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-most-famous-software-writ...