2 ms·

WEP yes, but AFAIK WPA/WPA2 with strong passphrase is still considered to be secure. Of course you need to have many security layers, but without described MITM

by comboy 10y ago

WEP yes, but AFAIK WPA/WPA2 with strong passphrase is still considered to be secure. Of course you need to have many security layers, but without described MITM, this layer doesn't seem to be broken.

notaplumber 10y ago
WPA? No. https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=148224048415556&w=2 https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=148224048415556&w=2 https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=148455931602152&w=2 https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=148455931602152&w=2
- h4waii 10y ago
  This is WPA-TKIP only. That doesn't mean WPA/2 is completely useless and broken.
- Cowicide 10y ago
  What's your practical alternative for WiFi security than WPA2-AES?
bitwize 10y ago
Your favorite crypto protocol/hash function/secure RNG is likely already broken -- it's just that no one has found an exploit yet.