4 ms·

I mean, if you were relying on WPA for security.. you have more important problems. As someone else pointed out, MitM attacks can happen at any hop on the Inter

I mean, if you were relying on WPA for security.. you have more important problems. As someone else pointed out, MitM attacks can happen at any hop on the Internet.

comboy 10y ago
WEP yes, but AFAIK WPA/WPA2 with strong passphrase is still considered to be secure. Of course you need to have many security layers, but without described MITM, this layer doesn't seem to be broken.
- notaplumber 10y ago
  WPA? No. https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=148224048415556&w=2 https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=148224048415556&w=2 https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=148455931602152&w=2 https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=148455931602152&w=2
  - h4waii 10y ago
    This is WPA-TKIP only. That doesn't mean WPA/2 is completely useless and broken.
  - Cowicide 10y ago
    What's your practical alternative for WiFi security than WPA2-AES?
- bitwize 10y ago
  Your favorite crypto protocol/hash function/secure RNG is likely already broken -- it's just that no one has found an exploit yet.