3 ms·
I think there is a difference on what the driver gets and what someone pays that the consumer is not responsible for. Its like arguing that you should go to the
by conanbatt 10y ago
I think there is a difference on what the driver gets and what someone pays that the consumer is not responsible for. Its like arguing that you should go to the restaurant that gives its waiters the highest salaries.
The consumer cannot have that responsibility, because the consumer doesnt agree with the employee what the employee salary is as much as the employee doesn't dictaminate how much the consumer can pay.
Plus its reasonable to react to the best incentives you have, and doing otherwise is actually negative: if uber is cheaper for the same its better to use it. This coming from someone that usually takes Lyft, because i dislike Uber, but if i knew i could get a cheaper ride i would use Uber as I have.
You dont do anyone a favor by staying unreasonable :)
- aussie123 10y agoBesides the monetary consideration (which appears to be the main argument), there is also an ethical one. Maybe fewer people care about ethics but its important to bring that into the mix.