3 ms·
Providing enough metadata to recognize the file different ways, is exactly what you're doing. Magnet already does this. > it's better suited to torrents and t
by geocar 10y ago
Providing enough metadata to recognize the file different ways, is exactly what you're doing.
Magnet already does this.
> it's better suited to torrents and things like that.
I don't understand what you mean by this.
- StavrosK 10y agoIt's more suited to applications that require a URI for a single file. I don't see how it can be applied here, or what benefit it has over a simple list.
- geocar 10y ago> It's more suited to applications that require a URI for a single file. Why exactly is it more suited? > I don't see how it can be applied here, or what benefit it has over a simple list. Winamp supported playlists containing http urls. If it supported magnet urls you would have every feature of your proposal and tooling to build other applications on. You could build this in about an hour and see a portable durable playlist. * https://github.com/captbaritone/winamp2-js https://github.com/captbaritone/winamp2-js * https://github.com/feross/webtorrent https://github.com/feross/webtorrent