2 ms·
That's a strange point to make about Scala. First of all you can choose if you build your Scala project with SBT, Maven or Gradle. Actually I know quite a few p
by misja111 10y ago
That's a strange point to make about Scala. First of all you can choose if you build your Scala project with SBT, Maven or Gradle. Actually I know quite a few people who switched from SBT to Gradle.
And the collection libraries is where Scala shines comparing to Java. Handling collections in Scala is just so much easier and more fun than in Java. Please try it out if you haven't done it yet.
- jankotek 10y agoIf you use Gradle with Scala, you are using it as 'better Java' (point from article. I worked with Scala collections for 9 years, last 5 years I implement collections for living ;-) Scala collections are behind in implementation. JSR166 (java.util.concurrent) made large performance progress in Java 8 and 9. It was never back ported to Scala. Nothing like `ConcurrentNavigableMap` is in Scala. Or Set with weakly referenced keys?