>The needs of a few never outweigh the needs of the many. This is, uhh, kind of false. In liberal democracies like the US, we have some extraordinarily protect

>The needs of a few never outweigh the needs of the many. This is, uhh, kind of false. In liberal democracies like the US, we have some extraordinarily protections for the needs of the few at the expense of the many. For example, we've ruled as unconstitutional anti-miscegenation laws. The founding fathers were explicitly worried about the tyranny of the majority, too.