I like the way you put it: the creators are required to subsidize the disabled. Would it be better if this was approached from the other side? Creators could c

I like the way you put it: the creators are required to subsidize the disabled. Would it be better if this was approached from the other side? Creators could create without this concern. Disabled consumers would then pay for services that make specific creations accessible to them. The US government could then explicitly subsidize the disabled people.