You could make that claim if they made such a decision, and you could assume they did if they had to go out of their way to disable CC. But of course, they have

You could make that claim if they made such a decision, and you could assume they did if they had to go out of their way to disable CC. But of course, they have to go out of their way to include CC (in time, money and effort) so its entirely absurd to name it "contempt". At best, its negligence, and at worst, its reasonable (the video lectures aren't really related to the school's operations, it just happens to be easy to do). Really, you could turn it around and call it contempt on the disabled's part, for suing with no clear benefit to anyone