3 ms·
> This isn't too different from the current format, except the URI method is pushing the type into the URI, rather than into the name of the key. Yup, which I
by zeveb 10y ago
> This isn't too different from the current format, except the URI method is pushing the type into the URI, rather than into the name of the key.
Yup, which I think is good, since URI schemes already exist for many identifiers, and more can be added.
> Would it be useful to be able to specify two different file paths or URIs for the same item?
I think so. Maybe one is one removable medium and the other is on another.
> The problem with multiple file paths is that both have the same weight, so how do you choose?
If they have equal weight, does it matter which you choose?
- StavrosK 10y agoYou're right, I have updated the spec to make each item a list. Since the URIs can be anything (including files), this is pretty much equivalent to your proposal.