4 ms·
As one example, "display" isn't made contingent on attribution. That's fine, but in general these software licenses do not cover "display", they cover _distrib
by matthewmacleod 10y ago
As one example, "display" isn't made contingent on attribution.
That's fine, but in general these software licenses do not cover "display", they cover _distribution_. If you consider "using code in a movie hacking UI" to be distribution, then you would already have been bound by the license. If you don't, then you're not. Nothing changes.
- dragonwriter 10y ago> That's fine, but in general these software licenses do not cover "display", they cover _distribution_. Yes, that means that "display", insofar as that corresponds to a copyright-protected exclusive right like performance, is not licensed by the license, and (if you aren't the original copyright holder) you have no authority to grant a sublicense to GitHub that covers display.