4 ms·
> I've used Emacs in the past, but something about the way in which you can navigate code just makes me feel less than efficient in it. Have you ever tried IDO
by vtail 16y ago
> I've used Emacs in the past, but something about the way in which you can navigate code just makes me feel less than efficient in it.
Have you ever tried IDO, http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/InteractivelyDoThings http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/InteractivelyDoThings?
- jrockway 16y agoIndeed. I don't even have to think about files anymore, thanks to eproject. If I want to edit my module Foo::Bar, I just say visit-project-file (C-c C-f), type in ::Ba or some other convenient substring, and hit enter. Now I'm there. And that's the worst case. If I want to see the definition of some function that the point is currently near, I just press M-. to visit it. And M-* to pop back to where I was before.
- justinweiss 16y agoIDO is 100% necessary for decent code navigation in emacs, but it's also worth trying textmate.el (http://github.com/defunkt/textmate.el http://github.com/defunkt/textmate.el), PeepOpen (http://peepcode.com/products/peepopen http://peepcode.com/products/peepopen), or my fuzzy-find-in-project (http://github.com/justinweiss/fuzzy-find-in-project http://github.com/justinweiss/fuzzy-find-in-project) for something like, but more flexible than, TextMate's command-T functionality.