4 ms·
It's meant as a temporary experiment. But we're thinking of having a handful of random days during the year where the price resets.
by fairpx 10y ago
It's meant as a temporary experiment. But we're thinking of having a handful of random days during the year where the price resets.
- padolsey 10y agoI feel that it should simply reset after X days without any takers, thereby reflecting the market's ill-appetite for the increased price. Or perhaps the price should decrease by $2 each day without takers. Would be really interesting to then graph the price after several months, seeing where the market settled.
- fairpx 10y agoSounds interesting but the problem then is that nobody will share it with friends. Since you gain an advantage by keeping it silent and take the low price offer when it resets. But I like the general thinking. Needs to be fleshed out.
- imdsm 10y agoHow about a pressure system? Each purchase increases the price by $2, but each day that passes without a purchase lowers it by $2. Eventually it would reach some sort of equilibrium of how much people are willing to pay for a simple logo service, right? Cool idea though.
- RugnirViking 10y agofor low demand/supply markets this sounds like a great way to set your price point generally as a buisness!
- gregmac 10y agoYou could have each logo price decrease by $2 per day it remains unsold. The starting price would follow the current rules, increasing $2 for every sale. Each logo should naturally go for a fair 'market' price (for that logo), and presumably will eventually be sold by the time it reaches $2. It prevents the service usage from leveling off as the price goes too high: at some point, it is cheaper to pay for a custom logo designed to spec. Plus it increases traction, especially for designers that need logos for clients: now there's incentive to come visit the page occasionally even if you don't currently need a logo, because there might be a gem sitting there for a good price.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]