2 ms·
> It was just too advanced for its time As in, too advanced to implement the basic functionality before being that advanced. But I think there's enough evidenc
by acqq 10y ago
> It was just too advanced for its time
As in, too advanced to implement the basic functionality before being that advanced. But I think there's enough evidence: only those who were physically forced to use it could have used it then. Which was my initial opinion.
P.S. Have you personally used VisualAge C++ in the nineties? Can you tell a bit about your use too? I see you're linking the other things that weren't and aren't that VisualAge C++ thing. Thanks.
- pjmlp 10y agoAs in, required too much computer resources for what people were willing to pay for, and was full of bugs. Lucid Energize C++ was way better, but bad management has a tradition to kill awesome products. https://www.dreamsongs.com/Cadillac.html https://www.dreamsongs.com/Cadillac.html