It strikes me that this is similar to the 'no true ai' paradox, where as soon as a program can do something, such as beat a human at chess, then it stops being

It strikes me that this is similar to the 'no true ai' paradox, where as soon as a program can do something, such as beat a human at chess, then it stops being AI and starts being just computation. As soon as something philosophical becomes rigerous or well understood, we stop calling it philosophy and start calling it mathematics.