> Having an emotional reaction and a strong dislike to the way a corporation behaves, isn't an argument for why it must fail. I agree with you here, but this i

> Having an emotional reaction and a strong dislike to the way a corporation behaves, isn't an argument for why it must fail. I agree with you here, but this is hardly the only argument presented in the article. Something has to change when investor subsidies dry up. It might be a shift to self driving vehicles, a significant fare increase, or a monopolisation of the market. His assertion (which I broadly agree with) is that none of those seem likely to be successful.