7 ms·
> You can also use it as a link organization/searching utility. You aren't selling this feature hard enough -- definitely mention it in the extension descripti
by woodrowbarlow 10y ago
> You can also use it as a link organization/searching utility.
You aren't selling this feature hard enough -- definitely mention it in the extension description. If I were on Chrome (I'm on Firefox), that feature would make me install it and use it instead of bookmarks.
Except... a 16-link limit? Seriously? That's not even enough to get a sense of whether it's something I'd enjoy using. Most people have more than 16 tabs open at any given time, not to mention bookmarks. If you're shipping this as a fremium thing, give users enough to get hooked.
- mikeshi42 10y agoThanks for the feedback! I've found out that a lot of people use this differently and I'm definitely still pivoting into the use case of organization and search and out of "oh this will get to your URLs faster". Thank you though, I'll be editing my description in a bit :P As for 16, I hover under the limit myself, but I understand if that might seem a bit low and that's fair. I was just experimenting with the idea of freemium and didn't want to have a higher limit and lower it later and have more people upset. I'll be looking to bump up the limit in the future (or possibly remove it, since it might not even be a feature people care about.) In your opinion, what do you think is a reasonable limit to set? (Or is it just unreasonable to limit it at all?)
- kinduff 10y agoIn my honest opinion, this kind of tools should not be monetized through its core functionality. My opinion as a user/developer, this is awesome, but 16? I would build one myself. Try to search another way to monetize, some ads on your landing page or additional features, but would not go to limit the core functionality. Good luck!