4 ms·
I think both. Don't take away the need to be a public figure and to verify your identity. Just make them pay in addition to these things. If you're a big enoug
by jamestnz 10y ago
I think both. Don't take away the need to be a public figure and to verify your identity. Just make them pay in addition to these things.
If you're a big enough public figure to want/need the blue tick, you're arguably making commercial use of twitter already, so you probably have a marketing budget that can sink a thousand bucks a year into maintaining your verified status with Twitter (in addition to proving your identity in usual ways).
If some famous person doesn't want to pay, that's fine: either quit using twitter's platform to market yourself, or continue but live without the tick.
- iamatworknow 10y agoI'm not sure I agree with your assessment of the type of people verified on twitter. I mainly use twitter to follow comedians, and most of them don't make a ton of money (surely not enough to afford "a thousand bucks a year" -- one of my favorite comedians working today has said publicly that he made all of $16k in 2015). And a few have become the victims of imposters who attempt to disrupt their careers by taking on their identity and messaging comedy clubs or TV networks or whatever. I don't think they are an untapped revenue stream.
- neotek 10y ago>one of my favorite comedians working today has said publicly that he made all of $16k in 2015). Who's that?