3 ms·
This is driven by the argument that drivers are not employees. He has no vested interest in the drivers circumstances.
by dswiese 10y ago
This is driven by the argument that drivers are not employees. He has no vested interest in the drivers circumstances.
- nilved 10y agoAs far as he is concerned drivers are not humans.
- simplehuman 10y agoHow did you reach this conclusion?
- nilved 10y agoI saw a video of the CEO talking to a driver.
- simplehuman 10y agoYou are contradicting yourself. The video then proves that he thinks the driver is capable of intelligent conversation. Unless you have seen videos of Travis talk to rocks, trees and bots. If so, please do share.
- atomical 10y agoI showed up to uber to pick up a phone that my girlfriend at the time had left in an uber. They told me to wait in line behind the drivers. "Sir, we are all customers here."