27 ms·
https://status.cloud.google.com/summary https://status.cloud.google.com/summary tells a different story or do you have other information? I have used GCP for s
by eicnix 10y ago
https://status.cloud.google.com/summary https://status.cloud.google.com/summary tells a different story or do you have other information?
I have used GCP for some time without being affected from any incident.
- briffle 10y agoThat is a pretty awesome page.. way better than a page full of green icons, during an obvious outage... I like that they have writeups a few days after the incidents....
- debaserab2 10y agoI'm not sure what you mean. If anything that link underscores my point. GCE has absolutely had it's own catastrophic errors. Remember last April when ALL instances in ALL regions went down? https://status.cloud.google.com/incident/compute/16007?post-mortem https://status.cloud.google.com/incident/compute/16007?post-...
- eicnix 10y agoThe GCP services are usually within their SLA target so I don't see the problem with the incidents. So you know what you buy and can take actions if you need a higher SLA for your application.
- debaserab2 10y ago> so I don't see the problem with the incidents All instances going down in all regions is an order of magnitude worse than a single service going down in a single region. You're deluding yourself if you think GCE is any more reliable than any other reputable cloud hosting platform.
- boulos 10y agoWhile I agree that was a horrific outage for us, there's a big difference between no external connectivity for a few minutes (note: internal IPs still worked fine, as did access to APIs through that mechanism) and "ALL instances in ALL regions went down". Disclosure: I work on Google Cloud (and wouldn't want to be an incident responder at AWS today...)
- miken123 10y agoAt least Google has a post-mortem, at AWS everything would still show up green with some random note about 'increased error rates'.