3 ms·
The article references a date in the future as if it has already happened: > In April 2017, the National Institute of Standards and Technology followed suit, s
by CoryG89 10y ago
The article references a date in the future as if it has already happened:
> In April 2017, the National Institute of Standards and Technology followed suit, starting a public vetting process lasting 4 to 6 years.
- jonbaer 10y agoGlitch in the matrix
- npongratz 10y agoI was confused as well. Perhaps the writer was referring to the NIST's April 2016 Report on Post-Quantum Cryptography: PDF: http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2016/NIST.IR.8105.pdf http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2016/NIST.IR.8105.pdf April 2016 report announcement: https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2016/04/nist-kicks-effort-defend-encrypted-data-quantum-computer-threat https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2016/04/nist-kicks-eff... Edit to add: In the above, I don't see mention of the public vetting process (my search fu is probably weak today). I would be interested in seeing the release of the ongoing commentary and proceedings.