3 ms·
This is a meaningful article, but the title / thesis that humans triumphed because of tool making ability does not represent the consensus of archeological find
by jonmc12 16y ago
This is a meaningful article, but the title / thesis that humans triumphed because of tool making ability does not represent the consensus of archeological findings at the time when Neanderthals disappeared.
Evidence also points towards the cro-mangon ability (vs neanderthal) to predict their environment. Specifically the ability to use the cycles of the moon to predict patterns of large game and organize group hunts allowed the cro-magnon to out-resource their Neanderthal peers. Prediction allowed for expanded social ability - not just tooling - which has a different notion of cognitive capability. One interesting article on the topic: http://www.bionomics-institute.org/text/resource/articles/ar_020.html http://www.bionomics-institute.org/text/resource/articles/ar...
- adammichaelc 16y ago"This is a meaningful article, but the title / thesis that humans triumphed because of tool making ability does not represent the consensus of archeological findings at the time when Neanderthals disappeared." That's not the thesis. The thesis is that humans flourished because they started trading, which led to innovations and also allowed people to tap into the "collective intelligence" of other groups.