> Yes, I am saying the law is not accurately represented. OK, now everything you've written makes sense - thank you. > You're reading too much into what I sai

> Yes, I am saying the law is not accurately represented. OK, now everything you've written makes sense - thank you. > You're reading too much into what I said. Sorry, but I just read what you wrote and took what I thought was the most obvious interpretation. As I explained earlier, you said: > This all seems reasonable to me. When that's a reply to a link to an article, it seems reasonable to me that the "this" should be referring to the article. The downvotes make it clear that my expectations were wrong. Thank you for your clarification.