> In other words, they have no qualms with racism -- only with racism against Han Chinese. Reminded me of the reaction to Peter Liang's indictment. From https:

> In other words, they have no qualms with racism -- only with racism against Han Chinese. Reminded me of the reaction to Peter Liang's indictment. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Akai_Gurley#Chinese-Americans https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Akai_Gurley#Chines... : More than 3,000 Chinese-Americans showed up at New York City Hall in March 2015 to support Liang. Thousands walked across the Brooklyn Bridge to Manhattan's Chinatown in April, feeling that Liang was being used as a scapegoat, and demanded the charges to be dropped, as other, white police officers were previously not charged. And earlier today I read the following excerpt from the press conference of Sunayana Dumala, the widow of Srinivas Kuchibhotla, the Indian man shot dead at Kansas. "I was told that that guy very proudly went to another bar and told that he shot two Muslim guys. How did he decide that by the color of a person? Does the color of the person state that he is a Muslim, a Hindu or a Christian? No. So how did that guy decide that?" Apparently, the grievance seems to be that Srinivas Kuchibhotla is not Muslim, but was mistook to be one unfairly based on his complexion.