3 ms·
Just to back it up a little: * Stack ranking at Cisco http://www.crn.com/slide-shows/networking/300075791/5-things-employees-love-about-cisco-and-5-they-dont
by openmosix 10y ago
Just to back it up a little:
* Stack ranking at Cisco
http://www.crn.com/slide-shows/networking/300075791/5-things-employees-love-about-cisco-and-5-they-dont.htm/pgno/0/2 http://www.crn.com/slide-shows/networking/300075791/5-things...
* Stack ranking at Google https://www.quora.com/Why-does-Google-stack-rank-its-employees-despite-the-high-rate-of-disapproval-and-controversy-within-the-company https://www.quora.com/Why-does-Google-stack-rank-its-employe...
* Stack ranking at Microsoft http://www.businessinsider.com/microsofts-old-employee-review-system-2014-8 http://www.businessinsider.com/microsofts-old-employee-revie...
* Stack ranking at Amazon http://insights.dice.com/2016/11/15/amazon-may-end-stack-ranking-employees/ http://insights.dice.com/2016/11/15/amazon-may-end-stack-ran...
- amaks 10y agoThere is (almost) always stack ranking for the purposes of equity and bonus distributions, implicit or explicit. But there is also bottom xx% rule for people that must be given bad reviews and placed on PIP. In Microsoft 2000s it was mandatory rule to axe 10% of bottom performers within a team.