2 ms·

I don't see why this would have a chilling effect on free speech. Surely people realize it's a crime to conspire to commit crimes?

• bediger4000 10y ago
  Because the way the bill apparently reads, anyone in a protest could end up with their property seized. Great way to bankrupt the Quakers, I suppose. Ensure that a few goons get into the next anti-war protest. Have the goons hype up a few unstable protestors into smashing a 7-11's window. Arrest everyone, and confiscate all their property. After that happens twice, all the Quakers are going to never organize again. Chilling effect. Luckily, Arizona didn't pass this, someone must have come to their senses.
  • gozur88 10y ago
    >Because the way the bill apparently reads, anyone in a protest could end up with their property seized. I didn't see anything like that. Perhaps you can cite a particular clause?