2 ms·
Miro is really nice. The issue is mostly just that, as data policy, we require ourselves to host/control/backup our data. Miro seems to be about a front-end f
by mdasen 16y ago
Miro is really nice. The issue is mostly just that, as data policy, we require ourselves to host/control/backup our data. Miro seems to be about a front-end for YouTube where users can comment and see the videos in your site. And that's wonderful for a lot of people, but it isn't what we're looking for since our policy is that we need to host the video ourselves.
I don't necessarily agree with the policy, but I understand it: other sites could take a video down that we don't want to lose or we don't have control over things like watermarks or whatnot or YouTube could (conceivably) break Miro in the future. That last one might not even be on purpose - if Miro is relying on YouTube acting a certain way and they change it, it could leave us scrambling a tad to get it working again.