>As an employee (and human) it seems reasonable to interpret it as "resources for humans" and thus assume it would be there to help. Where'd you ever get that

>As an employee (and human) it seems reasonable to interpret it as "resources for humans" and thus assume it would be there to help. Where'd you ever get that crazy idea? >But its true meaning, to execs/stakeholders/corporate persons, is "[the department which manages the] human resources". Not exactly. The true meaning is "the department which works to exploit the human resources as much as possible".