4 ms·
> I don't remember the exact numbers anymore, but in Australia at least the statistics suggest that if you: ..., Don't ride without a license, ..., and Don't ri
by vonmoltke 10y ago
> I don't remember the exact numbers anymore, but in Australia at least the statistics suggest that if you: ..., Don't ride without a license, ..., and Don't ride an unregistered bike
How does lack of a piece of paper increase your chances of dying?
- betenoire 10y agoIt puts you in the category of people who don't follow basic instructions.
- vonmoltke 10y agoI suppose there is some correlation there, but stating it like that makes it sound like causation since there is a causal relationship between deaths and the other two things presented in the same statement.
- ehnto 10y agoThat was the understanding I had, that not being in the group of people who do those types of things is what lowers your risk. But all of this is inferred by "what we know about the people who died" which as the article alludes to, is not a perfect measure.
- komali2 10y agoThat's the important bit to remember for a lot of these motorcycle statistics - so a squid with no gear might think "whatever man, I took the motorcycle safety course and I wear a helmet! I can lane at a delta of 40mph no problem!" Rather, all of those things combined (helmet wearing certificate-bearing registered-bike-owning) are the traits of a safe rider anyway, not necessarily the things that cause them to be a safe rider.
- ageofwant 10y agoIt does not, it tags you with attributes usually associated with the safer group. That's how statistical correlation works. It does not have any power, not in this sad amagic tyrannical causal universe we find ourselves in. Its a pity really, I'd sacrifice a horizontal vestal virgin for a piece of paper like that.