3 ms·
I found it interesting as I am in the market for a decent PM system that follows agile/kanban processes. Here is some feedback: 1. Add the ".io" to your logo.
by AmberShah 16y ago
I found it interesting as I am in the market for a decent PM system that follows agile/kanban processes. Here is some feedback:
1. Add the ".io" to your logo. Flow.io is a good enough name, but just seeing "Flow" in the title would make me come back to Flow.com or something.
2. I would very much like to try out using the system before having to sign up and create a name like myproject.flow.io.
3. My go-to PM tool right now is Acunote, and it allows for more free users (5, I think) and 1 project. That gives me the leeway to really use it with a client for a very small project, and then they would start to pay once it grows. At 1 user, that is really only a free trial, and I would not be able to use that with a real client (since we need at least one developer to login and one customer to login). I'm not upset that you're charging, I'm just saying it doesn't provide an in for me to start to use it with people before paying. On the flipside, Acunote is a lot more expensive when you start paying. Also, the flat pricing per user all the way up seems a little iffy, honestly. I think the pricing model should be revisited.
- aycangulez 16y agoI agree. It's a good idea to add .io to the logo. There is a 30-day free trial for paid plans (unlimited users and projects). Do you need a longer trial period? As for per user pricing, a lot of vendors charge a much higher per user fee (four or five times as much), and they greatly lower their pricing as the number of users increase. I think charging a flat low fee is better because you pay a lot less when you are first starting out. There is also an annual payment option, which gives you two months free.