3 ms·
Kinda hard to parse your argument then because > This is comparing apples and orange socks. The issue at hand is the safety net. If she gets fired, the underpe
by dkarapetyan 10y ago
Kinda hard to parse your argument then because
> This is comparing apples and orange socks. The issue at hand is the safety net. If she gets fired, the underperforming CEO gets enough money to continue her lifestyle - perhaps indefinitely.
I guess you're saying the comparison isn't even fair because it is completely different playing fields but it's hard to parse that from the above sentence structure.
- zeteo 10y agoYahoo does badly -> CEO still does well. Chobani does badly -> employees' Chobani stock is also doing badly. Giving more stock to employees is not a safety net.