4 ms·
Wait what? Are you seriously poking a hole in the argument by saying it's fine because CEOs are just used to being rich?
by dkarapetyan 10y ago
Wait what? Are you seriously poking a hole in the argument by saying it's fine because CEOs are just used to being rich?
- zeteo 10y ago>Are you seriously poking a hole in the argument by saying it's fine because CEOs are just used to being rich? That's pretty much the opposite of what I'm saying.
- dkarapetyan 10y agoKinda hard to parse your argument then because > This is comparing apples and orange socks. The issue at hand is the safety net. If she gets fired, the underperforming CEO gets enough money to continue her lifestyle - perhaps indefinitely. I guess you're saying the comparison isn't even fair because it is completely different playing fields but it's hard to parse that from the above sentence structure.
- zeteo 10y agoYahoo does badly -> CEO still does well. Chobani does badly -> employees' Chobani stock is also doing badly. Giving more stock to employees is not a safety net.
- charlesdm 10y agoPart of why she was able to negotiate that severance was probably also because she was well compensated at Google, and just said no unless they'd make her a good offer.