3 ms·

> From a hard-core libertarian perspective, the state has no right to exist That's a completely bogus argument- you're conflating anarchism with libertarianism

> From a hard-core libertarian perspective, the state has no right to exist That's a completely bogus argument- you're conflating anarchism with libertarianism in order to make libertarians look bad.

stale2002 10y ago
That's not anarchism. Self driving cars are already safer than humans. If something is already safer than humans, then it should be deployed in mass, NOW. Screw the laws. Or get rid of them. A million people die every year due to cars. The market can fix this if government gets out of the way.
- chc 10y ago
  "The state has no right to exist" is basically the definition of anarchism.
- slang800 10y ago
  The argument I gave was distinctly anarcho-capitalist. But, of course, there are plenty of statist arguments for reducing regulation.
slang800 10y ago
There's certainly a division between libertarian minarchists and libertarian anarchists, but I'm talking about the most "hard-core" application of the NAP.