6 ms·
From the final paragraph of the article: "If you could make a milk jug with 30 percent less material because it's mechanically better, think of the sustainabil
by 24gttghh 10y ago
From the final paragraph of the article:
"If you could make a milk jug with 30 percent less material because it's mechanically better, think of the sustainability of that," he said. "You're using less plastic, less oil, you have less stuff to recycle, you have a lighter product that uses less fossil fuel to move it."
In effect this could help to reduce consumption as you suggest (and as I agree).
- JoeAltmaier 10y agoThe milk jug is so light and thin already, any more improvement is lost in the noise. Consume (waste) less milk, you're doing an order of magnitude more good.
- byronwall 10y agoMillions of pounds of plastic are made every year for milk jugs. A 30% improvement would not be lost in the noise.
- JoeAltmaier 10y agoLost in the noise of producing milk. There is an astronomical amount of environmental resources to get to the point of filling the jug. Just wasting less milk (buy only what you can use to avoid dumping what has gone bad) would blow 'lighter milk jug' out of the water by many orders of magnitude. And using 30% fewer jugs saves 30% right out of the gate.
- wflynny 10y agoIsn't this reasoning essentially comparing a drop-in replacement with an ideal, though? Assuming this is a new technology that can actually make it through to manufacturing changes, the possible 30% reduction in plastic by using hybrid PE/PP is controlled by the relatively few milk producers and should be much more tenable than the societal change required for 30% reduction in milk use. Both reduce plastics usage, but one is a relatively quick change and the other requires change from many independent agents over a long time, so I don't understand why one is being trivialized. The perfect is the enemy of the good.
- JoeAltmaier 10y agoSure, go ahead and do it. But it hardly matters. We could also arrange a system to collect fingernail clippings and compost them to make fertilizer for public gardens for the poor. Its just that everybody's time is better spent on things that have larger marginal impact.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- 24gttghh 10y agoI do agree with reducing consumption in general, but less plastic per bottle certainly helps in this regard. I think drinking less or no "milk" (or any other drink) by itself is not a practical solution on its own.
- sametmax 10y agoPlus you may found out you are part of a population getting healthier with less milk input, and it's always good to know. It can take a lot of time to notice, and no doctor is going to advice for it but the effects can be important. It's worth a try.