He is trying to say that the fact the conclusions are true does not mean the reasoning behind it is. For example, I can say that hell is at the center of the E

He is trying to say that the fact the conclusions are true does not mean the reasoning behind it is. For example, I can say that hell is at the center of the Earth, and that's why it's hot. It is indeed hot, but it is not due to hell at all. In the context of this article, I don't think anyone is contesting that gay people are more likely to kill themselves, or that gay marriage is not an improvement. However, the quality of this specific study apparently can be doubted, and the fact that one agree with the conclusion does not mean we should be lenient on the quality of the math behind it