> The issue is lopsided in terms of cost benefit analysis. Nothing more. The benefits to the shareholders and employees of a few corporations are vastly outweig

> The issue is lopsided in terms of cost benefit analysis. Nothing more. The benefits to the shareholders and employees of a few corporations are vastly outweighed by the detriment to the rest of society. We're arguing past each other (I had already addressed this but I digress). > How does making it illegal for ISPs to favor traffic from some sources over others enable the government to take control over information sharing infrastructure? Never said it would enable the government to "take control over information sharing infrastructure". Net neutrality govern by the FCC gives them powers over the internet itself that can affect not just our country but other countries as well. This is a common talking point by the EFF folks regarding pros and cons of net neutrality.