2 ms·
It was a loaded, disingenuous question. It was one already answered several times in this thread. The very premise of the question was ridiculous to start with.
by lacampbell 10y ago
It was a loaded, disingenuous question. It was one already answered several times in this thread. The very premise of the question was ridiculous to start with. It also came attached to a left-wing conspiracy theory.
I would have been better off not reply to such drivel - thank you for reminding me.
- grzm 10y agoOther than the last bit where they express an opinion, I didn't take it that way at all, particularly as 'morgante specifically took care to include the statement regarding Trump not being responsible. There are quite a few people in this thread (myself included) who are not well-versed on a lot of the details that may go on during customs interviews. Having references (other than something someone said on some internet forum) is commendable—to me the antithesis of someone searching for a conspiracy. And if you thought it was disingenuous, and chose to answer anyway, don't make it worse: the goal should be to improve the conversation. Perhaps you thought they should have already known about such things, or that they should have looked them up on their own. You mention that it was answered elsewhere in the thread: you could have referenced those comments as well. but choosing to respond like you did does nothing to improve the discourse.