3 ms·
Eee. I think your idea of degrading isn't actually degrading! Respectfully, I believe you are misunderstanding the meaning of his words and possibly the idea of
by dbz 16y ago
Eee. I think your idea of degrading isn't actually degrading! Respectfully, I believe you are misunderstanding the meaning of his words and possibly the idea of "degrading to woman."
When you reversed the story (I'm completely ignoring the wife's second comment), you used a nickname "husby," which is clearly meant to be derogatory because you used it in a context akin to talking to a young child. Husbands shouldn't be treated like young children on leashes, so it is negative. The actual husband's article, however, meant to convey a sense of glee and admiration which is innocent and childlike in form. A positive emotion rather than a negative one. You may say because it is such an unadulterated emotion (and she starts "Tap. Tap. Tap" -ing away), that it is animalistic, but still not degrading to woman.
I believe you are seeing what you want to see- rather than what is actually there. His wife didn't just discover the internet, she discovered a new method of browsing it which is enchanting. Honestly, if you switched the husband and wife aspect of the article (not your recreation), it wouldn't seem degrading to men.
Respectfully,
dbz