4 ms·
Dumb outsider question: why not just mark studies that have been reproduced versus ones that still have not been reproduced? The way I view it is two steps of
by jeffdavis 10y ago
Dumb outsider question: why not just mark studies that have been reproduced versus ones that still have not been reproduced?
The way I view it is two steps of publication: the cutting-edge (not reproduced yet) versus independently reproduced.
- untilHellbanned 10y agoFiguring out which is which is easy enough. The real issue is people not over-interpreting the results.
- jeffdavis 10y agoMaybe it could score labs based on how many of the studies have been reproduced successfully? If something is not reproduced, and submitted by a lab with a low score, people would take it less seriously.